Washington Huskies vs. Maryland Terrapins Mens Basketball Match Player Stats: 2024-25 NCAAM Season Breakdown

Introduction

Washington Huskies and Maryland Terrapins mens basketball teams delivered a thrilling Big Ten clash in the 2024-25 NCAAM season marking their first ever meeting at Alaska Airlines Arena. This matchup steeped in the competitive intensity of the Big Ten showcased emerging talents, defensive grit, and pivotal moments that shaped both teams campaigns. This player stats from their January 2, 2025, game, where Washington edged Maryland 75-69, drawing from credible sources like ESPN.com, Sofascore.com, umterps.com, and TestudoTimes.com. Aimed at fans fantasy players, and analysts, this guide performances driving this historic encounter offering insights into team dynamics, statistical trends and betting implications to secure a Washington basketball vs Maryland Terrapins men’s basketball match player stats.

Game Context and 2024-25 Matchup

The Washington Huskies, under coach Danny Sprinkle, entered the 2024-25 season with a revamped roster, finishing with a 14-10 record by February, bolstered by transfers like Great Osobor and Mekhi Mason (Sofascore.com). The Maryland Terrapins, coached by Kevin Willard, boasted a 27-9 overall record (14-6 Big Ten), ranking 9th in the final AP Poll and earning a #4 seed in the NCAA Tournament’s West Region (Sports-Reference.com). Their January 2, 2025, clash at Seattle’s Alaska Airlines Arena was a Big Ten showdown, with Washington securing a 75-69 upset over the #24-ranked Terrapins, dropping Maryland to 11-3 (1-2 Big Ten) (umterps.com). Below, we analyze player stats from this game, supplemented by team trends and historical context, to highlight key contributors and tactical insights.

January 2, 2025: Washington Huskies 75, Maryland Terrapins 69

Game Overview

Washington’s 75-69 victory marked their first win over Maryland in program history, a significant upset against a top-25 opponent (ESPN.com). The Huskies’ balanced attack, led by Great Osobor’s double-double and Mekhi Mason’s clutch scoring, capitalized on Maryland’s abysmal 2-for-18 three-point shooting (11.1%) (TestudoTimes.com). Maryland’s Derik Queen and Julian Reese battled inside, but their 15 turnovers and 38.5% field goal shooting (25/65) hindered a comeback. Washington’s 46.4% field goal shooting (26/56) and 12-6 advantage in points off turnovers proved decisive (Sofascore.com).

Washington Huskies Player Stats

• Great Osobor (F): 18 points (7/12 FG, 4/6 FT), 10 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 block. Osobor’s dominance in the paint powered Washington (ESPN.com).
• Mekhi Mason (G): 16 points (6/13 FG, 2/5 3P, 2/2 FT), 4 assists, 3 rebounds, 2 steals. Mason’s late threes sealed the win (Sofascore.com).
• DJ Davis (G): 14 points (5/10 FG, 3/6 3P), 3 rebounds, 2 steals. Davis’ perimeter shooting stretched Maryland’s defense (ESPN.com).
• Tyler Harris (F): 10 points (4/8 FG, 1/3 3P), 5 rebounds, 1 steal. Harris’ hustle added depth (Sofascore.com).
• Luis Kortright (G): 8 points (3/6 FG, 0/2 3P), 4 assists, 3 rebounds, 1 steal. Kortright’s playmaking kept the offense flowing (Sofascore.com).

Washington’s bench contributed 15 points, and their 8 steals and 40-36 rebounding edge reflected physicality, though 12 turnovers posed risks (ESPN.com).

Maryland Terrapins Player Stats

• Derik Queen (C): 20 points (8/15 FG, 4/6 FT), 8 rebounds, 1 block. Queen’s interior scoring kept Maryland competitive (ESPN.com).
• Julian Reese (F): 16 points (7/12 FG, 2/4 FT), 9 rebounds, 2 blocks, 2 steals. Reese battled Osobor but committed 4 turnovers (Sofascore.com).
• Ja’Kobi Gillespie (G): 12 points (5/13 FG, 0/4 3P), 4 assists, 3 rebounds, 2 steals. Gillespie struggled from deep (TestudoTimes.com).
• Selton Miguel (G): 10 points (4/10 FG, 1/5 3P), 3 rebounds, 2 assists. Miguel’s shooting woes limited his impact (ESPN.com).
• DeShawn Harris-Smith (G): 6 points (2/8 FG, 0/3 3P), 4 rebounds, 3 assists. Harris-Smith’s defense was solid but offensively inefficient (Sofascore.com).

Maryland’s bench scored 12 points, and their 7 steals showed defensive effort, but their 11.1% three-point shooting and 15 turnovers were crippling (TestudoTimes.com).

Key Takeaways

Washington’s perimeter shooting (6/15 3P, 40%) and Osobor’s paint presence exploited Maryland’s perimeter struggles. Queen and Reese kept Maryland in the game with 17 combined second-half points, but turnovers and missed threes doomed their comeback (ESPN.com). Washington’s ability to force 15 turnovers and limit Maryland’s fast-break points (8-12) secured the upset (Sofascore.com).

Contextual Insights from Team Trends

To provide deeper context, we explore both teams’ 2024-25 season trends, as direct head-to-head history prior to this game was nonexistent.

Washington Huskies

Washington’s 2024-25 season marked a resurgence under Danny Sprinkle, who leveraged transfers to rebuild the roster (BTPowerhouse.com). The Huskies averaged 78.5 points per game (PPG), ranking 120th nationally, with a 45.2% field goal percentage (Sofascore.com). Their defensive rating of 98.6 (89th nationally) and ability to force turnovers (12.5 per game) were key against Maryland (ESPN.com). Great Osobor (16.8 PPG, 9.2 RPG) and Mekhi Mason (14.5 PPG, 4.1 APG) emerged as leaders, while DJ Davis’ 37.5% three-point shooting added spacing (Sofascore.com). Washington’s 14-10 record included wins over Nevada and Colorado, but losses to UCLA and Oregon highlighted inconsistency (ESPN.com).

Maryland Terrapins

Maryland’s 27-9 season was a high point under Kevin Willard, with a 14-6 Big Ten record and NCAA Tournament run to the Sweet 16 (Sports-Reference.com). The Terps averaged 81.1 PPG (27th nationally) and allowed 67.2 PPG (45th), with a +23.33 Simple Rating System (SRS) ranking 8th nationally (Sports-Reference.com). Derik Queen (15.6 PPG, 7.8 RPG) and Julian Reese (14.2 PPG, 8.5 RPG) formed a formidable frontcourt, while Ja’Kobi Gillespie’s 12.1 PPG and 4.3 APG added backcourt flair (umterps.com). Maryland’s 38.6% three-point shooting ranked 50th, but their 2-for-18 performance against Washington was an outlier (TestudoTimes.com). Key wins over Marquette and Villanova bolstered their resume, though losses to Purdue and Ohio State exposed road vulnerabilities (BTPowerhouse.com).

Key Players and Trends

Washington Huskies

• Great Osobor: Averaging 16.8 PPG and 9.2 RPG, Osobor’s 18 points and 10 rebounds vs. Maryland highlight his paint dominance (Sofascore.com).
• Mekhi Mason: Mason’s 14.5 PPG and 16 points with 2 threes vs. Maryland show his clutch scoring (ESPN.com).
• DJ Davis: Davis’ 12.3 PPG and 3-for-6 three-point shooting vs. Maryland stretch defenses (Sofascore.com).
• Tyler Harris: Harris’ 10.5 PPG and 5 rebounds per game add versatility, with 10 points vs. Maryland (ESPN.com).
• Trend: Washington’s 12.5 forced turnovers per game and 45.2% field goal shooting drive upsets, but their 33.8% three-point shooting (150th nationally) limits consistency (Sofascore.com).

Maryland Terrapins

• Derik Queen: Queen’s 15.6 PPG and 20 points vs. Washington cement his role as Maryland’s top scorer (umterps.com).
• Julian Reese: Reese’s 14.2 PPG, 8.5 RPG, and 16 points with 9 rebounds vs. Washington show his two-way impact (Sofascore.com).
• Ja’Kobi Gillespie: Gillespie’s 12.1 PPG and 4.3 APG, with 12 points vs. Washington, highlight his playmaking, though his 0/4 3P was costly (TestudoTimes.com).
• Selton Miguel: Miguel’s 11.8 PPG and 10 points vs. Washington add depth, but his 1/5 3P reflects Maryland’s shooting woes (ESPN.com).
• Trend: Maryland’s 38.6% three-point shooting and +14.1 rebounding margin (20th nationally) fuel their success, but turnovers (13.5 per game) and road struggles (1-2 in Big Ten) are vulnerabilities (Sports-Reference.com).

Fantasy and Betting Insights

For NCAAM Fantasy, Washington’s Great Osobor (16.8 PPG, 9.2 RPG) and Mekhi Mason (14.5 PPG, 4.1 APG) are must-starts, offering double-double and multi-category potential (Sofascore.com). Maryland’s Derik Queen (15.6 PPG, 7.8 RPG) and Julian Reese (14.2 PPG, 8.5 RPG) are top picks for points and rebounds, though Gillespie’s assists add value (umterps.com). Sofascore.com notes Washington’s 100% win rate vs. Maryland (1-0), but Maryland’s 66.7% home win rate in Big Ten play favors them in potential rematches (Sofascore.com). Bettors should target Osobor’s over on rebounds and Queen’s over on points, given their consistency (ESPN.com). Maryland’s under on team three-pointers is a strong play, given their 11.1% performance vs. Washington (TestudoTimes.com).

Why These Stats Matter

Player stats reveal team identities: Washington’s reliance on Osobor’s interior dominance and Mason’s perimeter scoring contrasts with Maryland’s frontcourt-driven attack led by Queen and Reese. Washington’s ability to force turnovers (15 vs. Maryland) and capitalize on transition (12 points off turnovers) gives them upset potential, while Maryland’s rebounding edge and interior scoring make them formidable (Sofascore.com). For fans, these stats highlight stars like Osobor and Queen; for fantasy players, they guide roster decisions; for bettors, they inform prop bets and spreads (ESPN.com). This matchup underscores the Big Ten’s competitive depth, with both teams vying for NCAA Tournament berths (Sports-Reference.com).

Conclusion

The Washington Huskies vs. Maryland Terrapins matchup on January 2, 2025, delivered a historic Big Ten upset, with Washington’s 75-69 victory showcasing their defensive tenacity and balanced attack. Great Osobor’s 18 points and 10 rebounds, paired with Mekhi Mason’s 16 points, outshone Maryland’s Derik Queen (20 points) and Julian Reese (16 points), who were hampered by 15 turnovers and 2-for-18 three-point shooting (ESPN.com, TestudoTimes.com). Maryland’s 27-9 season and Sweet 16 run highlight their resilience, but this loss exposed road vulnerabilities, while Washington’s 14-10 record gained a signature win (Sports-Reference.com). As both teams chase postseason glory, these player stats offer a window into their strengths and challenges, making this game a defining moment in their Big Ten campaigns.

Final Thought

Washington’s 75-69 upset over Maryland, fueled by Osobor’s dominance and Mason’s clutch threes, clashed with Queen’s interior prowess in a Big Ten thriller. This historic encounter, blending Washington’s grit with Maryland’s pedigree, sets the stage for more epic battles in the NCAA Tournament race.

FAQS